Atıf Formatları
Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?
  • IEEE
  • ACM
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • BibTeX

E. Yilmaz Et Al. , "Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?," Urology , vol.68, no.1, pp.24-27, 2006

Yilmaz, E. Et Al. 2006. Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?. Urology , vol.68, no.1 , 24-27.

Yilmaz, E., Batislam, E., Basar, M., TUĞLU, D., & Yuvanc, E., (2006). Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?. Urology , vol.68, no.1, 24-27.

Yilmaz, Erdal Et Al. "Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?," Urology , vol.68, no.1, 24-27, 2006

Yilmaz, Erdal Et Al. "Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?." Urology , vol.68, no.1, pp.24-27, 2006

Yilmaz, E. Et Al. (2006) . "Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?." Urology , vol.68, no.1, pp.24-27.

@article{article, author={Erdal Yilmaz Et Al. }, title={Can prilocaine infiltration alone be the most minimally invasive approach in terms of anesthesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?}, journal={Urology}, year=2006, pages={24-27} }