Management and mid- to long-term results of early referred bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Ozturk E., Can M. F., Yagci G., Ersoz N., ÖZERHAN İ. H., Harlak A., ...Daha Fazla

Hepato-Gastroenterology, cilt.56, sa.89, ss.17-25, 2009 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 56 Sayı: 89
  • Basım Tarihi: 2009
  • Dergi Adı: Hepato-Gastroenterology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.17-25
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Bile duct injury, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Referral, Management, SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT, BILIARY INJURY, RISK-FACTORS, POSTCHOLECYSTECTOMY, CHOLANGIOGRAPHY, COMPLICATIONS, EXPERIENCE, SURGERY, ROUTINE, LEAK
  • Lokman Hekim Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Background/Aims: Bile duct injuries (BDI) usually need operative repair and remain as a challenge even for surgeons who specialize in hepatobiliary surgery. The objective of this study was to define the presentation, in-hospital management, and mid- to long-term outcome of BDIs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) referred to a tertiary center in their early period. Methodology: From January 1996 to January 2006, 31 patients with BDI sustained during or after LC were treated at our institution. Patients were referred to our center from 18 community hospitals in their first 15 postoperative days. Patients' charts were retrospectively reviewed; presentation, management, and follow-up details recorded at the primary hospitals and at our institution were documented. Results: There were 5 patients with type-A and one with type-C injury, according to Strasberg classification. The remainders had a major BDI. The mean time to referral was 3.45 (median 2) days. Treatment methods chosen after referral were as follows: drainage-observation in 2 patients (6.5%), nasobiliary drainage in 4 (12.9%), endoscopic sphincterotomy plus biliary stenting in 1 (3.2%), and surgical intervention (duct-to-duct anastomosis or biliary-enteric reconstruction) in 24 patients (77.4%). Although a success rate of 83.3% was achieved in the early period, 10 patients (32.3%) had late postoperative complications (stricture and cholangitis), and of these, 3 required endoscopic stent placement, and 7 patients underwent a biliary diversion with Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy. One out of 24 patients with long-term follow-up developed biliary cirrhosis, and one patient with malignancy expired. Conclusions: Minor BDIs can be satisfactorily treated with endoscopic interventions. Extended lateral injuries, complete CBD transsections, and long segment stenosis usually require surgical therapy. Duct-to-duct anastomosis may be an option as the first-line therapy in selected patients after early referral, though many patients eventually require a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. © H.G.E. Update Medical Publishing S.A., Athens-Stuttgart.