Upper cervical vertebrae movement during intubating laryngeal mask, fibreoptic and direct laryngoscopy: A video-fluoroscopic study

Sahin A., Salman M., Erden I., AYPAR Ü.

European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol.21, no.10, pp.819-823, 2004 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 21 Issue: 10
  • Publication Date: 2004
  • Doi Number: 10.1017/s0265021504000110
  • Journal Name: European Journal of Anaesthesiology
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Page Numbers: pp.819-823
  • Keywords: Endoscopes, laryngoscopes, Intubation, intratracheal, Laryngeal masks, Spine, cervical vertebrae, atlas, axis
  • Lokman Hekim University Affiliated: Yes


Background and objective: Minimizing cervical vertebrae motion during endotracheal intubation is important in patients with cervical instability. The aim of this study was to compare upper cervical spine extension during endotracheal intubation using three different techniques. Methods: Duration of intubation and movement of upper cervical vertebrae during endotracheal intubation were compared in 33 patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy. Patients requiring tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade were randomly allocated into three groups - direct laryngoscopy, intubating laryngeal mask (LM) airway and fibreoptic laryngoscopy. The procedure was recorded by video-fluoroscopy and analysed with computer-assisted measurements. The maximum movement of the C1/C2 and C2/C3 vertebrae during intubation were obtained. Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: We found statistically significant movement between the first and second, but not between the second and third cervical vertebrae. The mean (±SD) movement at C1/C2 was 10.2 ± 7.3° with direct laryngoscopy, 5.0 ± 6.3° with LM and 1.6 ± 3.2° with fibreoptic laryngoscopy. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.01) between the direct and fibreoptic laryngoscopy groups. The maximum movement at C2/C3 was 2.2 ± 10.1° with direct laryngoscopy, 3.5 ± 5.1° with LM and 0.5 ± 3.2° with fibreoptic laryngoscopy. Duration of intubation was significantly longer in the intubating LM group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: We conclude that fibreoptic laryngoscopy is the more suitable intubation technique when cervical spine movement is not desired.