Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, cilt.150, sa.3, ss.261-270, 2009 (SCI-Expanded)
Background: The oral aspirin (ASA) provocation test is considered to be the gold standard in the diagnosis of ASA sensitivity. However, since it may be associated with severe adverse reactions, safer alternatives would be highly desirable. The basophil activation test has been proposed as such an alternative, but there is limited information about its usefulness. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of flow cytometric basophil activation in the diagnosis of ASA sensitivity. Methods: Patients with ASA sensitivity (n = 18), patients with ASA tolerance (n = 12) and healthy volunteers (n = 12) were included in the study. A 2-day single-blind placebo-controlled oral ASA provocation test was performed on all patients. Basophil activation after lysine-ASA and diclofenac stimulation was measured by Flow-CASTTM (Bühlmann Laboratories) for CD63 and an allergenicity kit (Beckman Coulter) for CD203c. The results of CD63 and CD203c were compared within groups, and sensitivity and specificity of the assay were measured against oral ASA provocation. Results: The highest sensitivity and specificity of CD63 were 33.3 and 79.2%, respectively, and of CD203c were 16.7 and 100%, respectively, for ASA. The highest sensitivity and specificity of CD63 were 16.7 and 91.7%, respectively, and of CD203c were 22.2 and 100%, respectively, fordiclofenac. Neither the addition of CD203c to CD63 nor the addition of diclofenac improves the overall sensitivity and specificity of CD63 to ASA. Conclusion: At present, basophil activation using CD63 and CD203c does not seem to be optimally sensitive for the diagnosis of ASA sensitivity. © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.