The time course of recovery following mild thoracic trauma


HAN S., Baldemir M., KÖSE S. K., Erdem D., Sakinci U.

Heart Lung and Circulation, cilt.14, sa.4, ss.252-254, 2005 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 14 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2005
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.hlc.2005.04.006
  • Dergi Adı: Heart Lung and Circulation
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.252-254
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Chest wall, Follow-up, Mild thoracic trauma, Randomized, Return to work, Rib fracture, Treatment
  • Lokman Hekim Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine when patients are able to return to their normal work or home activities. Patients and methods: Eighty cases, 35 females (44%) and 45 males (56%), presenting to our hospital between the years of 2003 and 2004 were prospectively evaluated. There were no hemopneumothorax or associated injury. The patients were randomized into two groups with respect to treatment modalities as the following: non-steroid anti-inflammatory (NSAIDs) and Tramadol treatment groups. In the follow-up, visual analog scale (VAS), and vital capacity were conducted on the days 0, 2, 7 and 30 and 6 months. The results were statistically analyzed. Results: The mean age of the group receiving NSAIDs was 55.42±15.72, and for the group receiving tramadol treatment, it was 55.67±17.23. VAS result was 7.8±1.8 in those receiving NSAIDs treatment, while it was 8.2±1.6 in the other group. The vital capacity was 235.54±82 ml for the former group, and 232.43±89.44 for the latter. In their follow-up, particularly by the 7th day, significant improvement of VAS and vital capacity were observed (p < 0.01). Maximum improvement was achieved on the 30th day (p < 0.001). There was no change in the 6th month. Conclusion: Patients are able to return to their normal work or home activities after 7 days. Patients experienced steadily decreasing pain and improved vital capacity at each time point after injury. No difference in response was seen between the two medications. A significant improvement is observed by the 7th day after the trauma (p < 0.01). Optimal improvement was achieved on the 30th day (p < 0.001). © 2005 Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.