Dose-dependent effects of ghrelin and aberrant anti-Mullerian hormone levels in the prevention of ovarian damage caused by cisplatin in Wistar-albino rats


Tutar E. O., Gözüküçük M., Kaya M. S., Macun A., Yücel D., Hücümenoğlu S., ...Daha Fazla

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, cilt.305, ss.1003-1009, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 305
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s00404-021-06292-4
  • Dergi Adı: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, BIOSIS, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1003-1009
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Ghrelin, Cisplatin, AMH, Ovarian follicles, Fertility preservation, SECRETAGOGUE RECEPTOR, CHEMOTHERAPY, EXPRESSION, STRESS, ACTIVATION, MECHANISMS, RESERVE, 1A
  • Lokman Hekim Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.Purpose: Ghrelin has previously been proven to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties in preventing cisplatin-induced ovarian damage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effects of this hormone in preventing this damage in rats using histopathological and biochemical methods. Methods: Twenty-eight Wistar-albino rats were randomly divided into four groups. While no drug was given to Group 1 (sham group), acylated ghrelin was intraperitoneally administered to Group 2 at 0.5 nmol/kg and Group 3 at 2 nmol/kg for 21 days. Group 4 received only saline solution. On the 15th day, a single dose of 5 mg/kg cisplatin was intraperitoneally administered to each rat in Groups 2, 3 and 4. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) values were measured on days 0, 15 and 21. Then, laparotomy and bilateral oophorectomy were performed, and the ovaries were histopathologically examined. Results: The number of primordial and primary follicles was significantly higher in Group 3 than in the saline solution + cisplatin group. In Group 4, cisplatin caused significantly higher follicle damage in the primordial, primary and secondary phases compared to the sham group. The AMH level of the SF + cisplatin group was significantly lower than that of the sham group and the high-dose ghrelin + cisplatin group, and the AMH level of the sham group was significantly higher than that of the low-dose ghrelin + cisplatin group. Conclusion: High-dose ghrelin was effective in preventing cisplatin-induced ovarian damage by preserving the number of primordial and primary follicles. Larger randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal dosage and duration of ghrelin.